I am currently developing a Linux application (in C++) using GTK (C) and have been evaluating gtkmm (C++). Based on my observations, gtkmm offers several advantages, such as:
Modern C++ features (RAII, smart pointers, type safety).
Object-oriented API, making development more intuitive.
Better signal handling with sigc::signal instead of function pointers.
My prediction is that gtkmm will not be very relevant unless there’s a surge of renewed interest from the community. You could be a part of that. gtkmm and all of its underlying C++ bindings are almost entirely maintained by one person, and he’s wanted to hand off the project for a long time.
I’ve not seen many apps that use gtkmm. Nickvision apps like Parabolic are in C++ but don’t use gtkmm; they just use a custom C++ template that wraps the C API manually.
I’m pretty sure I heard someone else wanted to make a new set of C++ bindings but I don’t remember who or how that turned out.
Claire is right. I’ve done more than 90% of the maintenance for several years.
I announced 4 years ago
that I wanted to quit as a maintainer. Still I will continue for a while.
What is sure is that when gtk5 is created, I will not contribute to gtkmm5.
There might never be a gtkmm5.
Considering how few issues and merge requests are created, I assume that gtkmm
is not much used. Inkscape is one user.