As previously stated downstream:
Suggestions Currently, it lacks a debuginfo download log, despite KDE’s DrKonqi providing one: …and a progress counter (think “6 of 30”). Example Solution Worth requesting at bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?component=gnome-abrt?
Suggestions
Currently, it lacks a debuginfo download log, despite KDE’s DrKonqi providing one:
I’ve been waiting for 30 minutes, yet there’s no “30 of 300” counter (like in DNF and Zypper), nor a prediction of how much time it’ll require: Worth requesting at bugs.kde.org/enter_bug.cgi?product=drkonqi?
…and a progress counter (think “6 of 30”).
Example
Would this be worth requesting at github.com/abrt/gnome-abrt/issues/new
?
ebassi
(Emmanuele Bassi)
February 14, 2025, 12:27am
2
What does this have to do with GNOME? Abrt is a Fedora project.
@ebassi , it’s called gnome-abrt
, so I presumed otherwise.
ebassi
(Emmanuele Bassi)
February 14, 2025, 12:52am
4
Even if it’s called gnome-abrt, it’s not maintained by the GNOME project.
1 Like
@ebassi , what is its relevance to GNOME, then?
ebassi
(Emmanuele Bassi)
February 14, 2025, 1:02am
6
None whatsoever: GNOME does not, and never did include abrt. It’s a Fedora project that shipped with Fedora only.
1 Like
@ebassi , I’m surprised that they are permitted to unilaterally utilise its branding. Is unrelated projects co-opting GNOME’s branding common?
ebassi
(Emmanuele Bassi)
February 14, 2025, 1:07am
8
It used to be the case, a long time ago. Older projects were grandfathered in, to avoid breaking existing installations, settings, and upgrades. These days, they would be asked to use another name for their project before their first release, or soon after.
1 Like